Support TOC
← End-times News

TOC News

Catholic Commentator Argues for Death Penalty in Certain Cases

Catholic Commentator Argues for Death Penalty in Certain Cases
The Blaze

A Catholic commentator argues that opposing the death penalty for murderers undercuts the principle of life's infinite worth, citing the case of Nidal Hasan, who killed 13 people in a mass shooting.

What happened

A Catholic commentator, John Doyle, has argued that opposing the death penalty for murderers, such as Nidal Hasan, undercuts the principle of life's infinite worth. Hasan, a radicalized Muslim U.S. Army psychiatrist, killed 13 people and wounded more than 30 others in a mass shooting at Fort Hood, Texas, in 2009.

Doyle, a BlazeTV host, claims that conservatives who stand on the principle that "life has infinite value" but oppose the death penalty are contradicting themselves. He argues that when someone murders an innocent person, they have taken something of infinite value, and the only way to approximate justice is to take the murderer's life.

Doyle's argument is based on the idea that human life has infinite value, and that taking a life is the only way to balance the scales of justice. He criticizes those who claim to value human life but oppose the death penalty, saying they have a "kind of indignation" that they do not extend to the murder victims themselves.

The death penalty remains a deeply divisive issue among Christians, with some holding that it is a biblically justifiable punishment and others arguing against it, citing New Testament teachings on mercy, forgiveness, and the sanctity of life.

Sources

The Blaze

Read original report ↗